Jurisdiction Intelligence Report

Employment Law Case Values in California (2026)

Data-driven verdict and settlement analysis for Employment Law cases in California. Median outcome: $14.0M across 5 tracked cases.

Verdicts Tracked
5
Median Outcome
$14.0M
Mean Outcome
$32.0M
Range
$2.6M–$103.0M

Verdict Distribution

RangeCasesPercent
$1M–$5M120%
$5M+480%

Key Valuation Factors

Type and severity of discrimination (age, disability, religious, etc.)Private vs. governmental employer defendantNumber of plaintiffs and case consolidation structureAvailability of punitive damages and egregiousness of employer conductStrength of documentary evidence and internal HR records

Key Trends & Insights

Notable Cases

Shegerian & Associates — Age Discrimination Verdict $103.0M
2025 · Shegerian & Associates (public post)

Record $103M age discrimination verdict — the largest of its kind in US history. Part of $141.45M in employment jury verdicts obtained by the firm in 2025.

View Source →
Shegerian & Associates — Disability Discrimination Verdict $32.3M
2025 · Shegerian & Associates (public post)

Record $32.3M disability discrimination verdict — the largest of its kind in US history. ADA/FEHA failure to accommodate and discriminatory termination.

View Source →
Pinter Brown v. UC Regents $14.0M
2024 · TopVerdict.com

Gender discrimination, workplace harassment, retaliation, and constructive discharge against University of California Regents. Details sparse in listing [TopVerdict.com](https://topverdict.com/lists/2024/united-states/top-20-labor-employment-verdicts).

View Source →
Toscano v. City of Oakland, et al. $2.6M
2024 · TopVerdict.com

Plaintiff alleged retaliation and sexual harassment creating a hostile work environment. Case involved workplace sexual harassment and victim retaliation. Jury awarded over $2.6 million.

View Source →
BART Religious Discrimination Verdict (6 plaintiffs) $8.0M
2024 · Shegerian Conniff

$7.98M total verdict ($1M+ per worker) for six BART employees denied religious exemptions from COVID vaccine mandate. Jury rejected BART's hardship defense.

View Source →

Get Your Case Evaluated

Use Harlan's AI-powered engine to analyze your Employment Law case in California against this verdict data.

Evaluate My Case →